Introduction to the Genuine Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15500ST
The authentic Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15500ST.OO.1220ST.03 represents the pinnacle of Swiss luxury watchmaking, carrying forward the iconic design language established by Gérald Genta in 1972. This 41mm stainless steel timepiece features the signature octagonal bezel secured by eight hexagonal screws, a design that revolutionized luxury sports watches. The genuine model houses the in-house Calibre 4302 automatic movement, boasting a 70-hour power reserve and refined finishing that meets the highest horological standards.Key characteristics of the genuine 15500ST:
- Case: 41mm diameter, 10.4mm thickness, alternating brushed and polished surfaces
- Dial: "Petite Tapisserie" guilloché pattern with applied hour markers
- Movement: Calibre 4302 with 32 jewels, 70h power reserve
- Bracelet: Integrated stainless steel with AP folding clasp
- Water resistance: 50 meters
- Retail price: Approximately $25,000-$30,000
APS Factory V2: The Closest Replica Achievement
Case & Dimensions: Precision Engineering
The APS V2 replicates the genuine watch's dimensions with remarkable accuracy at 41mm diameter and 10.4mm thickness - identical to the authentic piece. The octagonal bezel with its signature hexagonal screws is faithfully reproduced, with screw positioning and finish nearly matching the original.Case construction highlights:
- Uses 316L stainless steel (same as genuine)
- Alternating brushed/polished surfaces correctly executed
- Proper beveling on edges and lugs
- Screw tightness and alignment matching genuine
Dial & "Tapisserie" Pattern: Scrutinizing the Details
The dial represents APS Factory's most impressive achievement. The "Petite Tapisserie" pattern shows remarkable depth and precision, though the V3 version later improved the radiance and three-dimensional effect.Dial comparison:
- Logos: "AP" and "AUDEMARS PIGUET" show proper thickness/positioning
- Hour markers: Correct proportions but lume color slightly more "milky white"
- Date window: Proper font and magnification, though date change not as crisp
- Hands: Excellent finishing with sharp edges and proper lume application
Bracelet & Clasp: Metalwork Mastery
The bracelet represents one of the most challenging components to replicate accurately:
- Link construction: Same number with identical articulation
- Brushing/polishing: Alternating finishes match genuine specs
- End links: "Buffer zone" connection replicates genuine tension
- Clasp: CNC-machined engraving with correct sandblasted texture
Movement: The Cal.4302 Clone Breakthrough
The APS V2's cloned Cal.4302 movement represents a major advancement over previous replica movements:
- Power reserve: 72 hours (matches genuine)
- Balance wheel position: Correct at 7 o'clock
- Decoration: Geneva stripes and perlage finishing
- Functionality: Hacking seconds and bidirectional winding
Side-by-Side Comparison: Genuine vs. APS V2
| Feature | Genuine 15500ST | APS V2 Replica |
|---|---|---|
| Case Dimensions | 41mm × 10.4mm | 41mm × 10.4mm |
| Movement | Cal.4302 (70h PR) | Cloned 4302 (72h PR) |
| Dial Texture | Precise Petite Tapisserie | Very close, slightly less radiant |
| Date Change | Instantaneous | Slightly slower |
| Bracelet Quality | Exceptional finish | Nearly identical feel |
| Caseback Engraving | Deep, crisp | Slightly shallower |
| Lume Color | Bright white | Slightly milky white |
| Price | ~$25,000-$30,000 | ~$500-$800 |
Discussion Points for Watch Enthusiasts
- Value Proposition: Given that the APS V2 captures about 90-95% of the genuine aesthetic at 2-3% of the price, does this make genuine luxury watches "overpriced" or simply reflect different market segments?
- Wearability Experience: For daily wear where minor details aren't scrutinized, does the replica provide a comparable experience to genuine? How much does the "genuine article" psychological factor matter?
- Technical Achievement: APS Factory's movement cloning represents significant horological engineering - should this be recognized as technical achievement separate from IP concerns?
- Market Impact: Are high-quality replicas like this harming the genuine market, or could they actually serve as "gateway" products that eventually lead to genuine purchases?
- Version Comparison: With the APS V3 now available with improved dial texture and other refinements, is the V2 still worth considering given potential price differences?
We welcome perspectives from both genuine watch owners and replica enthusiasts - where do you stand on these issues? Does the APS V2 represent an acceptable alternative for enthusiasts who appreciate the design but can't justify the genuine price, or should horology purists reject replicas entirely? Share your thoughts on where the line should be drawn in appreciating watch design versus supporting the original manufacturers.